Practice Pulse vs Jane App

Jane App shows you reports. Practice Pulse tells you what to do.

Both are software for clinic owners. Only one names the patients about to drift, ranks them by recoverable revenue, and writes the rebook script ... by Tuesday morning, every week, automatically.

What Practice Pulse does that no PMS does

Yes, Jane is a great PMS

And we don't try to be one. Jane App handles bookings, charts, payments, telehealth. Those are the table stakes for running a clinic. Cliniko handles them too, and so does Nookal, and so does Pabau. They're all good at the table-stakes work.

But once your booking + charting + payments are running smoothly, the question stops being "how do I run my practice?" and starts being "how do I run it better?"

That's a different software category. That's Practice Pulse.

Already on Cliniko? You don't need Jane.

Cliniko handles bookings, charts and payments beautifully. The reason most clinics consider Jane is the analytics layer on top. We are that analytics layer, on top of Cliniko, for less than Jane charges by itself.

Jane App (1 practitioner)

~$160/mo

Full PMS plus Jane's analytics. You would be migrating off Cliniko to get here.

That is roughly $70/month cheaper than Jane, for a clinic stack that does more, not less. The gap holds or widens at scale because Practice Pulse uses per-clinic tiers (one flat fee for 2–5 practitioners, one for 6–8, and so on) instead of charging per seat.

The migration trap most pricing comparisons hide: moving from Cliniko to Jane costs 2–4 weeks of disrupted operations, staff retraining, data integrity risk and rebuilt integrations. Real cost: easily $5–15k in lost productivity. If you like your PMS, switching is rarely the right answer ... layering is.

So who should pick what

Request beta access → See full pricing